The 2026 election may not have produced a government that can last. Yesterday’s Democracy Briefing argued that a National-led coalition would be unusually fragile, and this column looks at how that fragility could lead to a second election. The right bloc has 67 seats, one more than the 66 needed for a majority. The special votes could still remove that margin, and even if it survives, any deal will be hard to hold together. Politicians and commentators are now openly discussing the possibility. It remains unlikely, but there are three ways it could come about, and the fear of being blamed for one is already shaping how the parties deal with each other.
Richard Prebble, the former Act leader and Labour minister, is already predicting one. He told Sean Plunket on The Platform today that the result would produce “a very unstable parliament”, and added: “I think we’ll be back at the ballot box within a year.”
(In the “Further Analysis” section after this column, I look at which parties would gain and lose from a second election, and at the rules that would decide whether one could be called.)
Nobody wants the blame
The Post’s Henry Cooke has set out how it could happen. In one possible outcome of the special votes, he writes, the left would be unable to govern even with the Opportunity Party, while the right could govern with it, “or face another election”. That would leave Qiulae Wong and her MPs deciding whether Christopher Luxon stays in office.
Both leaders say they want to avoid a rerun, and both are making sure the blame would fall elsewhere. Luxon told reporters after meeting Wong that “New Zealanders won’t thank us for going back to an election and back to the polls again”. Wong told the Post’s Anneke Smith that “we are just one party that’s at the table”, and that reaching agreement was not Opportunity’s job alone. She has a case, because if NZ First refused the fisheries or climate concessions that a deal required, Luxon would have to explain what he had offered and what his existing partners had turned down.
Three ways it could happen
The most immediate possibility is that no government can be formed after the official count on 27 November. National’s Mike Butterick leads Labour’s Kieran McAnulty by 139 votes in Wairarapa, and NZ First’s twelfth seat is also at risk. If both were lost, the coalition would have 65 seats in a House of 130, which is exactly half.
The former Act leader Rodney Hide, who backed vote-splitting and is no neutral observer, has published a computer simulation of the special-vote count. He ran it 40,000 times, and it produced a dead heat of that kind in about a quarter of the runs. Even then an election would not follow automatically, because Opportunity could let Luxon govern by abstaining, as yesterday’s “Further Analysis” explained. But terms would have to be found that Wong, David Seymour and Winston Peters could all accept.
A government could also form and later stop working. Seymour made a remarkable admission today when he told Chris Lynch that the coalition “barely survived” its first term. He also warned that talks on a new one could run until Christmas. That first-term government had 68 seats, and the same three parties have 67 on the preliminary count. National has no list MPs, so any vacancy in its caucus would ordinarily mean a by-election, and as Prebble put it, “You need a majority of more than one.” The AUT professor Wayne Hope said on The Bradbury Group that “chronic political instability is going to become the default setting”, and that he wouldn’t be surprised “to see another election before this term is up”.
Finally, a prime minister can go early by choice to seek a stronger mandate, as Helen Clark did in 2002. With National below 30% and his leadership in question, Luxon has little reason to try.
Why it probably won’t happen
Philip Joseph, a law professor at the University of Canterbury, told the Post’s Julie Jacobson it was extremely unlikely that a leader would breach the caretaker convention or call a fresh election, and that the process “is designed to actually form a government, not to force division”. Sir Geoffrey Palmer said the convention, under which the outgoing government carries on while the parties negotiate, is an “absolute safeguard”. New Zealand has never had an election forced because no government could be formed.
Nor could Luxon simply ask for one. The Cabinet Manual says the Governor-General will, by convention, act on a prime minister’s advice to call an early election “as long as the government appears to have the confidence of the House”, and that she would expect a caretaker prime minister to consult the other parties before giving such advice. Parliament must meet by 14 January, but that is a deadline for the House to sit, and the talks can run past it. When Jenny Shipley sacked Peters in 1998 and the coalition collapsed, National carried on as a minority government until the scheduled election.
Why the threat still matters
The threat of a second election affects the negotiations whether or not one is ever held. Each party is weighing what it would lose from a rerun, and those risks are very uneven. National could find itself helping the right to a bigger majority while its own position got weaker. Opportunity, on 5.96% with no electorate seat, could be voted out of Parliament altogether. Act and NZ First both grew this time, and have less to fear.
The imbalance gives Luxon’s partners a threat they may never need to carry out. The most likely result is a government that survives, with a prime minister who keeps making concessions to avoid an election he can’t be confident of winning.
Dr Bryce Edwards
Director of the Democracy Project
Who would blink first? The “Further Analysis” section that follows explains why National has more to fear from a second election than its partners do, why Opportunity could be punished whichever way it turns, and how the rules would constrain any prime minister who wanted to send voters back to the polls.
Paid subscriptions fund this research.